[Eine Bitte]Ping

freakshow10000 · Dec 6, 2011

Hi,

könnten ein paar von euch bitte diese 2 IPs über 10 - 20 Pakete pingen?

95.156.232.20 & 193.192.59.210

Sinn und Zweck ist es zu entscheiden ob ich jetzt bei meinem Traffic bleibe (2. IP) oder im Interwerk auf Premiumtraffic umsteige und könnte dafür ein paar vergleiche benötigen

MfG

virtual2 · Dec 6, 2011

Hetzner RZ13:

Code:

root@kennedy:~# ping 95.156.232.20
PING 95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=1 ttl=59 time=6.06 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=2 ttl=59 time=6.03 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=3 ttl=59 time=5.91 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=4 ttl=59 time=6.51 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=5 ttl=59 time=6.05 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=6 ttl=59 time=6.00 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=7 ttl=59 time=6.10 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=8 ttl=59 time=5.85 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=9 ttl=59 time=6.12 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=10 ttl=59 time=6.13 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=11 ttl=59 time=5.94 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=12 ttl=59 time=5.83 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=13 ttl=59 time=6.08 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=14 ttl=59 time=6.26 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=15 ttl=59 time=6.78 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=16 ttl=59 time=5.95 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=17 ttl=59 time=6.18 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=18 ttl=59 time=5.90 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=19 ttl=59 time=5.86 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=20 ttl=59 time=5.86 ms
^C
--- 95.156.232.20 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19026ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.836/6.074/6.785/0.231 ms

OVH RBX2:

Code:

root@web1:~# ping 193.192.59.210
PING 193.192.59.210 (193.192.59.210) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=1 ttl=59 time=13.3 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=2 ttl=59 time=13.4 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=3 ttl=59 time=13.6 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=4 ttl=59 time=13.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=5 ttl=59 time=13.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=6 ttl=59 time=13.1 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=7 ttl=59 time=13.6 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=8 ttl=59 time=13.1 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=9 ttl=59 time=13.3 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=10 ttl=59 time=13.3 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=11 ttl=59 time=13.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=12 ttl=59 time=13.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=13 ttl=59 time=13.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=14 ttl=59 time=13.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=15 ttl=59 time=13.3 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=16 ttl=59 time=13.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=17 ttl=59 time=13.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=18 ttl=59 time=13.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=19 ttl=59 time=13.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=20 ttl=59 time=13.0 ms
^C
--- 193.192.59.210 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19028ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 13.010/13.202/13.677/0.233 ms

Equinix FFM 2:

Code:

root@lbx3-2:~# ping 95.156.232.20
PING 95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=1 ttl=58 time=1.87 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=2 ttl=58 time=2.37 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=3 ttl=58 time=1.74 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=4 ttl=58 time=1.40 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=5 ttl=58 time=1.83 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=6 ttl=58 time=1.50 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=7 ttl=58 time=1.88 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=8 ttl=58 time=1.75 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=9 ttl=58 time=1.69 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=10 ttl=58 time=1.65 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=11 ttl=58 time=1.87 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=12 ttl=58 time=1.62 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=13 ttl=58 time=1.91 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=14 ttl=58 time=1.98 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=15 ttl=58 time=2.21 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=16 ttl=58 time=1.90 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=17 ttl=58 time=1.95 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=18 ttl=58 time=1.68 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=19 ttl=58 time=1.71 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=20 ttl=58 time=1.65 ms

--- 95.156.232.20 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19007ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.409/1.812/2.372/0.220 ms

freakshow10000 · Dec 6, 2011

Ok danke!

Könntest du nochmal von zu Hause aus Pingen?
Und / oder von Hetzner nochmal beide zum vergleich (die 193)?
MfG

virtual2 · Dec 6, 2011

freakshow10000 said:
Ok danke!

Könntest du nochmal von zu Hause aus Pingen?

MfG

Kein Problem

1&1 Internet AG - 16Mbit DSL

Code:

root@RX1:~$ ping 193.192.59.210
PING 193.192.59.210 (193.192.59.210) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=15.8 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=16.1 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=15.8 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=16.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=15.3 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=15.7 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=15.9 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=8 ttl=57 time=15.9 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=9 ttl=57 time=15.5 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=10 ttl=57 time=15.6 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=11 ttl=57 time=15.5 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=12 ttl=57 time=15.5 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=13 ttl=57 time=16.2 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=14 ttl=57 time=15.4 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=15 ttl=57 time=15.4 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=16 ttl=57 time=15.6 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=17 ttl=57 time=15.7 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=18 ttl=57 time=15.6 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=19 ttl=57 time=14.7 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=20 ttl=57 time=15.6 ms
^C
--- 193.192.59.210 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19074ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 14.746/15.683/16.246/0.356 ms

freakshow10000 · Dec 6, 2011

Hi,

könntest du die andere auch einmal von zuhause pingen?

MfG

virtual2 · Dec 6, 2011

freakshow10000 said:
Hi,

könntest du die andere auch einmal von zuhause pingen?
MfG

Code:

root@RX1:~$ ping 95.156.232.20
PING 95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=14.9 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=15.7 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=15.5 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=15.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=14.5 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=14.8 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=15.0 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=8 ttl=58 time=14.9 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=14.7 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=10 ttl=58 time=15.6 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=11 ttl=58 time=15.0 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=12 ttl=58 time=15.3 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=13 ttl=58 time=14.5 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=14 ttl=58 time=15.3 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=15 ttl=58 time=15.2 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=16 ttl=58 time=14.6 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=17 ttl=58 time=15.0 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=18 ttl=58 time=14.7 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=19 ttl=58 time=15.5 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=20 ttl=58 time=15.3 ms
^C
--- 95.156.232.20 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19078ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 14.522/15.100/15.730/0.382 ms

Jesaja · Dec 6, 2011

DTAG DSL16k, Region Hannover:

Code:

root@zawsrv:~# ping 95.156.232.20
PING 95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=1 ttl=58 time=13.9 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=2 ttl=58 time=14.3 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=3 ttl=58 time=13.4 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=4 ttl=58 time=13.9 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=5 ttl=58 time=14.0 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=6 ttl=58 time=13.5 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=7 ttl=58 time=58.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=8 ttl=58 time=14.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=9 ttl=58 time=13.6 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=10 ttl=58 time=13.5 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=11 ttl=58 time=19.2 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=12 ttl=58 time=15.4 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=13 ttl=58 time=13.9 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=14 ttl=58 time=14.3 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=15 ttl=58 time=17.9 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=16 ttl=58 time=13.4 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=17 ttl=58 time=16.8 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=18 ttl=58 time=13.8 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=19 ttl=58 time=13.2 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=20 ttl=58 time=14.1 ms
^C
--- 95.156.232.20 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19021ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 13.293/16.775/58.114/9.612 ms

Code:

root@zawsrv:~# ping 193.192.59.210
PING 193.192.59.210 (193.192.59.210) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=1 ttl=57 time=16.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=2 ttl=57 time=32.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=3 ttl=57 time=15.6 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=4 ttl=57 time=15.4 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=5 ttl=57 time=15.7 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=6 ttl=57 time=16.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=7 ttl=57 time=16.7 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=8 ttl=57 time=15.4 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=9 ttl=57 time=15.3 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=10 ttl=57 time=15.4 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=11 ttl=57 time=15.4 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=12 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=13 ttl=57 time=15.7 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=14 ttl=57 time=15.7 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=15 ttl=57 time=15.9 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=16 ttl=57 time=15.9 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=17 ttl=57 time=15.7 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=18 ttl=57 time=15.6 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=19 ttl=57 time=15.7 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=20 ttl=57 time=16.0 ms
^C
--- 193.192.59.210 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19029ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 15.351/17.667/37.480/5.768 ms

chrismaden · Dec 6, 2011

1&1 16.000

Code:

root@home:~# ping 95.156.232.20
PING 95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=1 ttl=56 time=36.5 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=2 ttl=56 time=36.2 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=3 ttl=56 time=36.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=4 ttl=56 time=35.8 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=5 ttl=56 time=36.9 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=6 ttl=56 time=36.5 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=7 ttl=56 time=36.3 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=8 ttl=56 time=36.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=9 ttl=56 time=36.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=10 ttl=56 time=36.0 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=11 ttl=56 time=35.9 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=12 ttl=56 time=36.2 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=13 ttl=56 time=36.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=14 ttl=56 time=36.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=15 ttl=56 time=36.9 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=16 ttl=56 time=36.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=17 ttl=56 time=36.4 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=18 ttl=56 time=35.5 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=19 ttl=56 time=36.2 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=20 ttl=56 time=36.7 ms
^C
--- 95.156.232.20 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19030ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.598/36.288/36.950/0.360 ms

blupp1 · Dec 6, 2011

Just-ping schon ausprobiert?

telelo · Dec 6, 2011

Die Route zu den IPs scheint mit diesem Alice-DSL Anschluss in Hamburg Jacke wie Hose zu sein, wobei die Premium-95-er IP einen Hop mehr hat. Die Ping-Zeiten sind ziehmlich identisch. Ein kleiner Vergleich:

Alice-DSL in Hamburg (Telefónica):

Code:

traceroute to 193.192.59.210 (193.192.59.210), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
 1  thilo.lan (10.0.42.1)  1.236 ms  1.047 ms  0.949 ms
 2  lo1.br13.weham.de.hansenet.net (213.191.76.39)  71.849 ms  41.261 ms  37.890 ms
 3  ge-7-2-8-0.xd02.weham.de.hansenet.net (62.109.119.146)  37.989 ms  39.304 ms  37.861 ms
 4  ae8-0.cr01.asham.de.hansenet.net (62.109.67.253)  38.261 ms  39.654 ms  39.865 ms
 5  ae4-0.cr01.fra.de.hansenet.net (213.191.66.77)  46.156 ms  47.664 ms  45.917 ms
 6  ae1-0.xd02.fra.de.hansenet.net (62.109.69.34)  46.109 ms ae1-0.xd01.fra.de.hansenet.net (62.109.69.6)  47.920 ms  47.719 ms
 7  ae1-0.pr03.decix.de.hansenet.net (213.191.66.142)  46.109 ms ae0-0.pr03.decix.de.hansenet.net (213.191.66.138)  47.654 ms  47.512 ms
 8  decix.link11.de (80.81.192.218)  45.920 ms  47.269 ms  45.953 ms
 9  80.95.152.210 (80.95.152.210)  56.139 ms  52.845 ms  50.112 ms
10  193.192.59.210 (193.192.59.210)  47.839 ms  48.978 ms  47.812 ms

Code:

--- 193.192.59.210 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19026ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 46.766/48.193/49.475/0.806 ms

Code:

traceroute to 95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
 1  thilo.lan (10.0.42.1)  1.229 ms  1.101 ms  1.009 ms
 2  lo1.br13.weham.de.hansenet.net (213.191.76.39)  37.853 ms  39.525 ms  39.932 ms
 3  ge-7-2-8-0.xd02.weham.de.hansenet.net (62.109.119.146)  37.887 ms  39.195 ms  38.012 ms
 4  ae8-0.cr01.weham.de.hansenet.net (62.109.67.249)  39.947 ms  39.519 ms  37.969 ms
 5  ae4-0.cr01.fra.de.hansenet.net (213.191.66.73)  46.007 ms  47.465 ms  45.899 ms
 6  ae0-0.xd02.fra.de.hansenet.net (62.109.69.30)  45.890 ms ae0-0.xd01.fra.de.hansenet.net (62.109.69.2)  47.536 ms ae0-0.xd02.fra.de.hansenet.net (62.109.69.30)  47.382 ms
 7  ae0-0.pr03.decix.de.hansenet.net (213.191.66.138)  47.367 ms  47.515 ms  45.989 ms
 8  decix.link11.de (80.81.192.218)  45.874 ms  47.433 ms  45.930 ms
 9  80.95.152.178 (80.95.152.178)  53.948 ms  49.364 ms  46.120 ms
10  95.156.203.34 (95.156.203.34)  81.928 ms  91.406 ms  51.840 ms
11  95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20)  45.953 ms  47.111 ms  45.961 ms

Code:

--- 95.156.232.20 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19025ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 45.845/47.177/49.461/1.085 ms

filoo GmbH in Frankfurt

Code:

traceroute to 193.192.59.210 (193.192.59.210), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
 1  ffm-93-190-64-1.gw.as47215.net (93.190.64.2)  2.225 ms  1.957 ms  2.289 ms
 2  93-190-67-17.reverse.cust.as47215.net (93.190.67.17)  194.528 ms  0.831 ms  0.562 ms
 3  decix.link11.de (80.81.192.218)  1.971 ms  1.686 ms  1.523 ms
 4  80.95.152.210 (80.95.152.210)  3.895 ms  5.020 ms  9.798 ms
 5  193.192.59.210 (193.192.59.210)  2.171 ms  1.753 ms  1.918 ms

Code:

--- 193.192.59.210 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19027ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.407/1.778/2.227/0.240 ms

Code:

traceroute to 95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
 1  ffm-93-190-64-1.gw.as47215.net (93.190.64.2)  1.835 ms  0.852 ms  2.010 ms
 2  93-190-67-17.reverse.cust.as47215.net (93.190.67.17)  0.470 ms  0.478 ms  0.415 ms
 3  decix.link11.de (80.81.192.218)  1.314 ms  1.151 ms  1.287 ms
 4  80.95.152.178 (80.95.152.178)  22.674 ms  65.666 ms  31.466 ms
 5  95.156.203.34 (95.156.203.34)  1.506 ms  1.945 ms  2.031 ms
 6  95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20)  2.314 ms  1.830 ms  1.831 ms

Code:

--- 95.156.232.20 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19040ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.592/2.068/2.523/0.279 ms

VolumeDrive in Clarks Summit, PA (Burst.net?):

Code:

traceroute to 193.192.59.210 (193.192.59.210), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  gwy01.vlan01.volumedrive.com (66.197.221.129)  0.415 ms  0.461 ms  0.553 ms
 2  core.sctn01.volumedrive.com (64.191.116.245)  0.465 ms  0.510 ms  0.546 ms
 3  te4-1.ccr01.phl03.atlas.cogentco.com (38.104.114.213)  5.249 ms  5.347 ms  5.426 ms
 4  te7-3.ccr01.phl01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.189)  4.971 ms te4-3.ccr01.phl01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.233)  5.049 ms te7-3.ccr01.phl01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.189)  4.962 ms
 5  te0-3-0-3.mpd21.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.110)  7.710 ms  7.822 ms te0-4-0-1.ccr22.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.31.53)  7.609 ms
 6  te0-2-0-6.ccr21.jfk07.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.1.218)  7.903 ms te0-4-0-6.ccr21.jfk07.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.44.222)  7.939 ms te0-5-0-0.ccr21.jfk07.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.80.178)  7.778 ms
 7  gblx.jfk07.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.14.70)  12.580 ms gblx.jfk07.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.11.62)  12.770 ms  12.713 ms
 8  * link11-gmbh.tengigabitethernet9-2.ar4.cdg2.gblx.net (206.165.73.126)  91.292 ms  91.266 ms
 9  80.95.152.210 (80.95.152.210)  91.237 ms  91.184 ms  91.195 ms
10  193.192.59.210 (193.192.59.210)  91.227 ms  91.359 ms  91.342 ms

Code:

--- 193.192.59.210 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 19 received, 5% packet loss, time 19000ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 90.983/91.456/91.986/0.418 ms

Code:

traceroute to 95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  gwy01.vlan01.volumedrive.com (66.197.221.129)  0.427 ms  0.453 ms  0.519 ms
 2  core.sctn01.volumedrive.com (64.191.116.245)  0.599 ms  0.622 ms  0.640 ms
 3  xe1-01.gwy03.sctn01.hostnoc.net (96.9.191.34)  0.483 ms  0.462 ms  0.489 ms
 4  nyiix.he.net (198.32.160.61)  6.776 ms  7.164 ms  6.820 ms
 5  * * *
 6  10gigabitethernet3-3.core1.lon1.he.net (72.52.92.242)  90.351 ms *  83.928 ms
 7  10gigabitethernet4-2.core1.fra1.he.net (184.105.213.146)  97.348 ms 10gigabitethernet1-2.core1.par2.he.net (184.105.213.94)  89.322 ms 10gigabitethernet4-2.core1.fra1.he.net (184.105.213.146)  97.244 ms
 8  * os.gigabitethernet2-12.core1.fra1.he.net (216.66.84.222)  89.627 ms  89.914 ms
 9  os.gigabitethernet2-12.core1.fra1.he.net (216.66.84.222)  134.506 ms  134.471 ms 109.230.212.130 (109.230.212.130)  150.168 ms
10  95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20)  94.672 ms  94.276 ms  95.193 ms

Code:

--- 95.156.232.20 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 18997ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 90.286/92.828/95.488/1.483 ms

Hetzner muss ich dann wohl nicht mehr testen, das wurde ja schon gezeigt.

So wie es mir scheint, wirst du mit dem teureren Premium-Traffic keinen Gewinn machen. Wenn die Anzahl der ICMP-Pakete aus den USA auf die Premium-Traffic-IP steigt, tritt auch hier ein geringer Packetloss auf. Jedoch würde ich hier auch den Anbieter vermuten, da geht öfter mal ein Paket verloren…

JaEgErmEistEr · Dec 6, 2011

Ping von 1und1 zu Hause:

Code:

Ping wird ausgefhrt fr 95.156.232.20 mit 32 Bytes Daten:
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=42ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=39ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=39ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=41ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=39ms TTL=55

Ping wird ausgefhrt fr 193.192.59.210 mit 32 Bytes Daten:
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=39ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=39ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=39ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=39ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=39ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=39ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=39ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=39ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=39ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=39ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=39ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=39ms TTL=55
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=40ms TTL=55

Von Hosteurope

Code:

PING 95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=4.43 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=5.39 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=4.64 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=4.89 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=4.99 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=4.91 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=4.71 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=8 ttl=58 time=4.79 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=5.23 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=10 ttl=58 time=4.57 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=11 ttl=58 time=4.52 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=12 ttl=58 time=4.55 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=13 ttl=58 time=4.66 ms

--- 95.156.232.20 ping statistics ---
13 packets transmitted, 13 received, 0% packet loss, time 12007ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.439/4.795/5.392/0.280 ms



PING 193.192.59.210 (193.192.59.210) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=4.27 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=4.48 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=4.61 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=4.38 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=4.20 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=4.25 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=4.29 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=8 ttl=58 time=4.39 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=4.48 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=10 ttl=58 time=4.42 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=11 ttl=58 time=4.28 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=12 ttl=58 time=4.16 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=13 ttl=58 time=4.50 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=14 ttl=58 time=4.04 ms

--- 193.192.59.210 ping statistics ---
14 packets transmitted, 14 received, 0% packet loss, time 13007ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.046/4.344/4.617/0.156 ms

Manu · Dec 6, 2011

STRATO:

Code:

PING 95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=1 ttl=59 time=14.2 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=2 ttl=59 time=14.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=3 ttl=59 time=13.8 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=4 ttl=59 time=13.8 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=5 ttl=59 time=14.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=6 ttl=59 time=13.8 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=7 ttl=59 time=13.8 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=8 ttl=59 time=13.8 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=9 ttl=59 time=13.8 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=10 ttl=59 time=13.6 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=11 ttl=59 time=14.3 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=12 ttl=59 time=14.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=13 ttl=59 time=14.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=14 ttl=59 time=14.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=15 ttl=59 time=14.3 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=16 ttl=59 time=14.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=17 ttl=59 time=14.1 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=18 ttl=59 time=13.8 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=19 ttl=59 time=14.6 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_req=20 ttl=59 time=14.6 ms

--- 95.156.232.20 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19029ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 13.638/14.103/14.631/0.277 ms

Ronny1008 · Dec 6, 2011

Ping von meinem Server aus.

root@srv01:~# ping 193.192.59.210
PING 193.192.59.210 (193.192.59.210) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=1 ttl=59 time=1.13 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=2 ttl=59 time=1.65 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=3 ttl=59 time=1.54 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=4 ttl=59 time=1.38 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=5 ttl=59 time=1.79 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=6 ttl=59 time=1.39 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=7 ttl=59 time=1.46 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=8 ttl=59 time=1.56 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=9 ttl=59 time=1.36 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=10 ttl=59 time=1.63 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=11 ttl=59 time=1.28 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=12 ttl=59 time=1.94 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=13 ttl=59 time=1.19 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=14 ttl=59 time=1.69 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=15 ttl=59 time=1.64 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=16 ttl=59 time=1.14 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=17 ttl=59 time=1.52 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=18 ttl=59 time=1.63 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=19 ttl=59 time=1.90 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=20 ttl=59 time=1.49 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=21 ttl=59 time=1.82 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=22 ttl=59 time=1.85 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=23 ttl=59 time=1.67 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=24 ttl=59 time=1.44 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=25 ttl=59 time=1.56 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=26 ttl=59 time=1.48 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=27 ttl=59 time=1.58 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=28 ttl=59 time=1.99 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=29 ttl=59 time=1.96 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=30 ttl=59 time=1.17 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=31 ttl=59 time=1.22 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=32 ttl=59 time=1.62 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=33 ttl=59 time=2.18 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=34 ttl=59 time=1.27 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=35 ttl=59 time=1.74 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=36 ttl=59 time=1.38 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=37 ttl=59 time=1.57 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=38 ttl=59 time=1.49 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=39 ttl=59 time=1.19 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=40 ttl=59 time=1.63 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_req=41 ttl=59 time=1.01 ms
^C
--- 193.192.59.210 ping statistics ---
41 packets transmitted, 41 received, 0% packet loss, time 40056ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.010/1.544/2.182/0.261 ms

icebeer · Dec 6, 2011

KabelBW:

Code:

PING 95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=16.106 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=11.341 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=12.032 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=12.053 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=12.104 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=11.595 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=14.051 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=11.962 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=8 ttl=57 time=11.634 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=9 ttl=57 time=11.748 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=10 ttl=57 time=12.551 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=11 ttl=57 time=11.173 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=12 ttl=57 time=11.415 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=13 ttl=57 time=11.963 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=14 ttl=57 time=12.054 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=15 ttl=57 time=12.117 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=16 ttl=57 time=12.868 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=17 ttl=57 time=12.135 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=18 ttl=57 time=11.208 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=19 ttl=57 time=13.085 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=20 ttl=57 time=12.085 ms

--- 95.156.232.20 ping statistics ---
21 packets transmitted, 21 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 11.173/12.251/16.106/1.080 ms

Code:

traceroute to 95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  172.30.13.61 (172.30.13.61)  10.706 ms  14.006 ms  6.906 ms
 3  HSI-KBW-078-042-040-048.hsi3.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de (78.42.40.48)  18.705 ms  7.820 ms  8.053 ms
 4  ae1.FRA-M1.ip-bb.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de (78.42.40.17)  12.649 ms  12.592 ms  11.119 ms
 5  ae0.FRA-M2.ip-bb.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de (78.42.40.9)  10.608 ms  11.161 ms  11.042 ms
 6  optimate.aixit.kleyrex.net (193.189.82.140)  12.113 ms  13.785 ms  11.522 ms
 7  95.156.203.34 (95.156.203.34)  12.533 ms  13.406 ms  11.451 ms
 8  95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20)  11.854 ms  13.308 ms  12.259 ms

Code:

PING 193.192.59.210 (193.192.59.210): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=11.882 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=11.859 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=11.803 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=11.464 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=13.379 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=12.814 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=12.126 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=13.094 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=8 ttl=57 time=12.882 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=9 ttl=57 time=12.089 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=10 ttl=57 time=13.021 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=11 ttl=57 time=12.268 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=12 ttl=57 time=11.939 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=13 ttl=57 time=11.455 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=14 ttl=57 time=11.071 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=15 ttl=57 time=11.982 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=16 ttl=57 time=12.605 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=17 ttl=57 time=12.859 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=18 ttl=57 time=10.725 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=19 ttl=57 time=12.622 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=20 ttl=57 time=12.152 ms

--- 193.192.59.210 ping statistics ---
21 packets transmitted, 21 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 10.725/12.195/13.379/0.674 ms

Code:

traceroute to 193.192.59.210 (193.192.59.210), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  172.30.13.61 (172.30.13.61)  8.025 ms  7.839 ms  6.971 ms
 3  HSI-KBW-078-042-040-048.hsi3.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de (78.42.40.48)  8.706 ms  8.712 ms  7.925 ms
 4  ae1.FRA-M1.ip-bb.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de (78.42.40.17)  10.929 ms  11.710 ms  12.166 ms
 5  decix.link11.de (80.81.192.218)  21.913 ms  13.335 ms  12.598 ms
 6  80.95.152.210 (80.95.152.210)  17.250 ms  12.166 ms  13.434 ms
 7  193.192.59.210 (193.192.59.210)  12.547 ms  12.545 ms  14.751 ms

freakshow10000 · Dec 6, 2011

Ok,

vielen dank!

Dann bleib ich doch erstmal bei meinem Paket

Achja, das jetzt ist auch schon Premiumtraffic.. Jedoch sieht es bei mir so aus das die 95.156.232.20 4ms besser ist .. trotzdem gleichem Routing.

MfG

seraphim · Dec 7, 2011

Daheim

Ping wird ausgeführt für 95.156.232.20 mit 32 Bytes Daten:

Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=22ms TTL=57
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=21ms TTL=57
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=21ms TTL=57
Antwort von 95.156.232.20: Bytes=32 Zeit=21ms TTL=57

Ping-Statistik für 95.156.232.20:
Pakete: Gesendet = 4, Empfangen = 4, Verloren = 0 (0% Verlust),
Ca. Zeitangaben in Millisek.:
Minimum = 21ms, Maximum = 22ms, Mittelwert = 21ms

Ping wird ausgeführt für 193.192.59.210 mit 32 Bytes Daten:

Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=25ms TTL=57
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=23ms TTL=57
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=25ms TTL=57
Antwort von 193.192.59.210: Bytes=32 Zeit=24ms TTL=57

Ping-Statistik für 193.192.59.210:
Pakete: Gesendet = 4, Empfangen = 4, Verloren = 0 (0% Verlust),
Ca. Zeitangaben in Millisek.:
Minimum = 23ms, Maximum = 25ms, Mittelwert = 24ms

Server:

ping 95.156.232.20
PING 95.156.232.20 (95.156.232.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=1.57 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=1.77 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=1.75 ms
64 bytes from 95.156.232.20: icmp_seq=4 ttl=60 time=1.64 ms
^C
--- 95.156.232.20 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3005ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.573/1.685/1.776/0.092 ms

ping 193.192.59.210
PING 193.192.59.210 (193.192.59.210) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=1.86 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=2.00 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=1.73 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.59.210: icmp_seq=4 ttl=60 time=1.73 ms
^C
--- 193.192.59.210 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3003ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.734/1.837/2.007/0.112 ms

auf die 2/100 Millisekungen noch mehr Geld ausgeben...

freakshow10000 · Dec 7, 2011

Wie gesagt ich bleib erstmal bei meinem

Medana.IT · Dec 7, 2011

Hey,

ich glaube der Premium-Traffic unterscheided sich tatsächlich nur ob du ein direktes Telekom peering drin hast oder nicht...
Frag doch einfach mal nach wo der Unterschied liegt.

Grüsse

freakshow10000 · Dec 7, 2011

Medana.IT said:
Hey,

ich glaube der Premium-Traffic unterscheided sich tatsächlich nur ob du ein direktes Telekom peering drin hast oder nicht...
Frag doch einfach mal nach wo der Unterschied liegt.

Grüsse

Hi,

bei beiden IPs handelt es sich um Premiumtraffic

Wie du schon gesagt hast, die 1. IP ist mit DTAG und Link11 als Carrier angebunden, die 2. mit Link11 und Lambdanet.

MfG

Whistler · Dec 8, 2011

In dem Zusammenhang vielleicht ganz nützlich: http://www.traceroute.org/#Germany

[Eine Bitte]Ping

freakshow10000

Guest

Registered User

freakshow10000

Guest

Registered User

freakshow10000

Guest

Registered User

Member

Keep it Low

blupp1

Guest

New Member

Registered User

Manu

Guest

New Member

New Member

freakshow10000

Guest

New Member

freakshow10000

Guest

New Member

freakshow10000

Guest

Well-Known Member